A few more pieces in the endless mosaic of proofs of Google’s infallibility:

1 The Curious Case of Jonas Bronck

Google offered a standard, run-of-the-mill description (text sourced from Wikipedia), but assigned to this infobox a contemporary photograph of certain Mr Curt Wrigfors, the chairman of eponymous Jonas Bronck Centre (of Bronx fame) in Swedish settlement of Sävsjö, not far from Mr Bronck’s actual birthplace. The screenshot was taken in 2017, some two to three years after an article with Mr Wrigfors’ now most famous mug had been published (presently it is fixed, though).

2 Wen Jia, a Chinese painter-cum-table-tennis-player

And that’s not all. Certain Mr Wen Jia should not have had a color picture taken, I assume:

Let’s take a closer look at the by-now-infamous Google knowledge panel:

3 The case of Zhang Hong, another painter who immortalized not only his subjects

I guess the Chinese were indeed lightyears ahead of the West. Printing press, gun powder, glasses, color photography… What else? Oh, I got it! Longevity:

4 When Google thinks every dot signifies the end of a sentence

5 Soapbox

Now, Google should make up its mind:

Do they mean ‘soapbox‘ as in a motorless vehicle propelled by gravity, which is raced on a downhill road, as evidenced by the picture, or do they perhaps mean ‘soapbox‘ as a crate used as a makeshift stand or a raised platform on which a public speaker stands to make an impromptu speech, often about a political subject, as evidenced by the description?

6 Andrea Rossi

That is not that Andrea Rossi. Andrea Rossi of that knowledge panel is a slightly crazy Italian inventor. Remember, dear children, the scientific law № 1: Insane inventors invariably possess hair tousled irreversibly in proportion to the degree of their lunacy.

7 Point Pleasant

On the subject of Google making up its mind deep mind: